You are not logged in. Access is limited. Login or see membership information. • EVcast
You Must Be Logged In
You must be a member of this group and logged in to rate this post. Please see the links above on joining this group and/or logging in.

EVcast.com is the home of the EVcast.  The EVcast is a podcast dedicated to bringing consumers the latest information on electric vehicles in a non-technical, non-political, and entertaining way.  Don't forget, you can also subscribe to this podcast via iTunes or your favorite podcatcher.

NEW! Stream the latest episode of the EVcast from your website by including this one simple line of javascript:

<script src="http://www.igroops.com/evcast.js" type="text/javascript"></script>


Watch this Blog Notify me by e-mail any time a new post is made to this blog.

Subscribe to this Podcast
via iTunes!

The EVcast is a podcast dedicated to bringing consumers the latest information on electric vehicles in a non-technical, non-political, and entertaining way.

Become Our Platinum Sponsor
Product ID: 00000003
Currently In Stock: 0

For the main sponsor, you get the big prize! A 622px wide x 100px tall banner that will appear on just about every page within EVcast.com, including blog posts. On the homepage, in place of the banner you will have a custom ... More »

Price: $2500.00

August 2008 Posts

Archives


  The EVcast
Blog Entry

EVcast #48: Interview with Jerry Asher - In Da House!

Monday, August 4th 2008 @ 11:47 AM (not yet rated)    post viewed 2161 times

click to download this audio file

 

 

  • Interview with Jerry Asher - In Da House!
  • GM Updated Numbers
  • ZAP a Chick Magnet
  • 2008 Plug In Videos
  • LiIon Update
  • Open Source EVs
  • Listener Feedback

 

 

Share

Don't just listen to the EVcast -- experience and be a part of it!  Join us at 1:00pm Eastern, M-F, in our live video broadcast and chat along with us!

add a comment  rate this post: very bad poor average good fantastic!
Comments

John Briggs
Free Access
JohnBriggs said on Monday, August 4th 2008 @ 1:26 PM:

Jerry Asher is a great spokesman for PHEV and a wonderful guest.  His vocal rhythms remind me a little of Fred Rogers of Mister Roger's Neighborhood.

    Please won't you be my EV neighbor?

quote comment


Guest
a guest said on Tuesday, August 5th 2008 @ 3:03 AM:

40 mph.

According to Johns data, you will get best mileage in a gas car between 35-45 at constant rate, thus the optimal would be 40 mph. However, if you are forced to do stop and go at the 40 mph rate, you would be better off at higher speeds.

Expect good mileage in Yellowstone Park. However, if the government lowers the speed limit in Los Angeles, it might actually increase fuel consumption in the city since lower speeds on the highway may also lead to more congestion and stop and go. However, today at 70 mph seems you are doing stop and go anyways.

BillB

quote comment


John Briggs
Free Access
JohnBriggs said on Tuesday, August 5th 2008 @ 8:08 AM:

Bill,
    I am a little skeptical that higher speeds reduces traffic congestion but perhaps this has been well studied by traffic engineers and I am just ignorant.
    There was a study done by traffic engineers a few years back that I thought was completely counter intuitive.  Here is what they found.  If there is a car accident blocking all the lanes in the highway, and then the accident clears suddenly (i.e. the police reopens the road), everyone speeds away together and get up to 65MPH.  However, down the road a little bit something happens and waves of congestion start to occur and traffic slows and can become stop-and-go.

    However, if after the accident, the cars are let out at a controlled rate, perhaps one car every 10 seconds or something, then no congestion occurs down the road and people actually get to their destination sooner.

    While I believe the traffic engineers, this is completely counter intuitive.  By slowly releasing the cars, people actually arrive at their destination sooner.  So perhaps our gut instincts about improving traffic flow at not correct.

     In California, I have seen something similar where there are traffic lights controlling the rate at which cars can get onto the highway.  We don't have these here in the east.  But perhaps that would do more to reduce congestion than any change to the speed limit.

    Currently I am getting 43MPG on my 2004 Toyota Corolla by limiting my speed to 55 MPH.  If I drive at 70 MPH this drops to about 38MPG.  So driving slow and steady is better.  My commute went from 30 minutes to 35 minutes.  So the time plenalty was not too bad.

    I see a lot of people on the highway trying to drive at 85 MPH.  This is not an effecient speed. It is made worse by the fact that they end up having to apply their brakes at 85 MPH because the guy in front is only going 70 MPH.  They get around him, speed up to 85 MPH again, and then apply the brakes again.   I know this well, I used to be that guy.  It doesn't make sense.

Later
John C. Briggs

quote comment


Bo Bennett
Tuesday Host
Group Administrator
Bo said on Tuesday, August 5th 2008 @ 8:39 AM:

Not to mention, John, the guy who drives 85mph is also at a financial disadvantage not only because of spending more on gas, but also the occasional $300+ speeding ticket.

quote comment