You are not logged in. Access is limited. Login or see membership information. • EVcast

EVcast.com is the home of the EVcast.  The EVcast is a podcast dedicated to bringing consumers the latest information on electric vehicles in a non-technical, non-political, and entertaining way.  Don't forget, you can also subscribe to this podcast via iTunes or your favorite podcatcher.

NEW! Stream the latest episode of the EVcast from your website by including this one simple line of javascript:

<script src="http://www.igroops.com/evcast.js" type="text/javascript"></script>


Watch this Blog Notify me by e-mail any time a new post is made to this blog.

Subscribe to this Podcast
via iTunes!

The EVcast is a podcast dedicated to bringing consumers the latest information on electric vehicles in a non-technical, non-political, and entertaining way.

Become Our Platinum Sponsor
Product ID: 00000003
Currently In Stock: 0

For the main sponsor, you get the big prize! A 622px wide x 100px tall banner that will appear on just about every page within EVcast.com, including blog posts. On the homepage, in place of the banner you will have a custom ... More »

Price: $2500.00

August 2008 Posts

Archives


  The EVcast
Blog Entry

EVcast #51: Obnoxious Noise, Unnecessary Press Releases, and 'Racist' Commercials

Thursday, August 7th 2008 @ 11:43 AM (not yet rated)    post viewed 4851 times

click to download this audio file

  • Drivetones!  I Kid You Not
  • Make Your Own Awesome EV
  • ZAP Investment, KY Laws, Promises...
  • Head Hunting
  • New Nissan Commercial "Deserves Pushishment"
  • Listener Feedback
Share

Don't just listen to the EVcast -- experience and be a part of it!  Join us at 1:00pm Eastern, M-F, in our live video broadcast and chat along with us!

Comments

James Schultz
Free Access
broschultz said on Thursday, August 7th 2008 @ 2:50 PM:

Would you follow up on the MIT announcement of their new Solar discovery and implications for the ev market.  I think it means $1 a gallon gas in a year and an ev in every garage in 11 years.

 

              Jim Schultz

quote comment add new comment


Paul Cummings
Free Access
PaulCummings said on Thursday, August 7th 2008 @ 3:11 PM:

In regards to the Robert Riley site, at: http://www.rqriley.com/

I think you are recalling the projet "Electirc Cars-Now!" started by those crazy Finns- their site (the small part of it that is in English thus far) is:

http://www.sahkoautot.fi/eng

However, they seem more akin to Calcars then the Rqriley Enterprises site in that they are proposing conversions of existing cars as opposed to building a car from scratch.  Ther are starting with one car for now, a Toyota, that I think one of the articles says is only available in Europe, not the US- but this may change.

quote comment add new comment


Ryan Levesque
Tuesday Host
Free Access
Ryan said on Thursday, August 7th 2008 @ 3:34 PM:

Hi Paul - yes, "Electric Cars - Now!" is indeed the Finlandian outfit we were trying to recall. I agree, Robert Q. Riley Enterprises does appear more similar to Calcars in concept than ECN. I think the point Bo was making is that it would be cool if RQR put in place a system similar to ECN!, whereby you could order all your components for the XR3, find a company to assemble it for you, etc. One stop shopping for the consumer, and makes obtaining the vehicle accessible to folks who have the $$, but don't have the skills and/or machinery to DIY.

quote comment add new comment


John Briggs
Free Access
JohnBriggs said on Friday, August 8th 2008 @ 8:01 AM:

Jim,
    I think the MIT discover doesn't mean anything for EVs or anything else for that matter.

    They have discovered a way to more efficiently produce hydrogen.  This is good because current hydrogen processes are only 25% efficient due to the need to produce the hydrogen and then convert it back into electricity.  Battery technologies are more like 90% effecient.  So hydrogen makes no sense at all. 

    If we assume the MIT process makes the conversion process 50% efficient, it still doesn't make sense.  We will still need batteries just for efficiency.

    Add to this the problems of storing hydrogen and the enormous cost of fuel cells, and I think the MIT invention may have little practical benefit at this time.

    Also, commercializing any product is likely to take 2 years at a minimum from the time they start, and there is no indication that anyone has started to do that.

     I have no doubt that the MIT invention is a great breakthrough, it is just that hydrogen has additional problems that will prevent it from being practical.

      And, by the way, solar power is very expensive (perhaps 30cent/KWH or more compared to 19 for grid electricity).  So I am not sure how reasonable the rest of their story-telling is.

Later

John C. Briggs

quote comment add new comment


Paul Cummings
Free Access
PaulCummings said on Friday, August 8th 2008 @ 12:26 PM:

I would echo John's thoughts on this- though perhaps in the future it may provide one more option to store solar or wind-genterated energy on a small scale- i.e. the home owner.  This is why EESTOR, if they do come thru with a product, is so intriguing- their product would not just be a revolutionary battery for the EV, but a storage unit for renewable energy generation, both on the home level and the utility level- this market may be as large or larger than the EV market for their product.

quote comment add new comment